Richard Dedekind Net Worth

Richard Dedekind was a German mathematician born in 1831 who made significant contributions to the field of abstract algebra, particularly the algebraic theory of numbers, the ring theory, and the foundation of real numbers. He wrote a paper describing the nature of numbers and defining an infinite set of numbers. He spent most of his life in Braunschweig, Germany, teaching mathematics and editing the works of Bernhard Riemann, Carl Gauss, and Peter Dirichlet. His most notable contribution was the publication of their works in a single volume. Dedekind was known for his ability to express his ideas clearly and concisely, and his analysis of infinite and real numbers was not fully appreciated until after his death.
Richard Dedekind is a member of Scientists

Age, Biography and Wiki

Who is it? Mathematician
Birth Day October 06, 1831
Birth Place Braunschweig, Germany, German
Age 188 YEARS OLD
Died On 12 February 1916(1916-02-12) (aged 84)\nBraunschweig, German Empire
Birth Sign Scorpio
Alma mater Collegium Carolinum University of Göttingen
Known for Abstract algebra Algebraic number theory Real numbers
Fields Mathematician Philosopher of mathematics
Doctoral advisor Carl Friedrich Gauss

💰 Net worth

Richard Dedekind, a renowned mathematician hailing from Germany, is projected to have a net worth ranging from $100,000 to $1 million by the year 2024. Known for his invaluable contributions to the field of mathematics, Dedekind's work has left an indelible mark on the discipline. His concepts on real numbers, number systems, and set theory have significantly influenced the development of modern mathematics. With such an influential legacy, it is no surprise that Dedekind's financial worth aligns with his intellectual contributions.

Some Richard Dedekind images

Famous Quotes:

Although the book is assuredly based on Dirichlet's lectures, and although Dedekind himself referred to the book throughout his life as Dirichlet's, the book itself was entirely written by Dedekind, for the most part after Dirichlet's death.

— Edwards, 1983

Biography/Timeline

1848

He first attended the Collegium Carolinum in 1848 before transferring to the University of Göttingen in 1850. There, Dedekind was taught number theory by professor Moritz Stern. Gauss was still teaching, although mostly at an elementary level, and Dedekind became his last student. Dedekind received his doctorate in 1852, for a thesis titled Über die Theorie der Eulerschen Integrale ("On the Theory of Eulerian integrals"). This thesis did not display the talent evident by Dedekind's subsequent publications.

1854

At that time, the University of Berlin, not Göttingen, was the main facility for mathematical research in Germany. Thus Dedekind went to Berlin for two years of study, where he and Bernhard Riemann were contemporaries; they were both awarded the habilitation in 1854. Dedekind returned to Göttingen to teach as a Privatdozent, giving courses on probability and geometry. He studied for a while with Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet, and they became good friends. Because of lingering weaknesses in his mathematical knowledge, he studied elliptic and abelian functions. Yet he was also the first at Göttingen to lecture concerning Galois theory. About this time, he became one of the first people to understand the importance of the notion of groups for algebra and arithmetic.

1858

In 1858, he began teaching at the Polytechnic school in Zürich (now ETH Zürich). When the Collegium Carolinum was upgraded to a Technische Hochschule (Institute of Technology) in 1862, Dedekind returned to his native Braunschweig, where he spent the rest of his life, teaching at the Institute. He retired in 1894, but did occasional teaching and continued to publish. He never married, instead living with his sister Julia.

1863

Dedekind edited the collected works of Lejeune Dirichlet, Gauss, and Riemann. Dedekind's study of Lejeune Dirichlet's work was what led him to his later study of algebraic number fields and ideals. In 1863, he published Lejeune Dirichlet's lectures on number theory as Vorlesungen über Zahlentheorie ("Lectures on Number Theory") about which it has been written that:

1879

The 1879 and 1894 editions of the Vorlesungen included supplements introducing the notion of an ideal, fundamental to ring theory. (The word "Ring", introduced later by Hilbert, does not appear in Dedekind's work.) Dedekind defined an ideal as a subset of a set of numbers, composed of algebraic integers that satisfy polynomial equations with integer coefficients. The concept underwent further development in the hands of Hilbert and, especially, of Emmy Noether. Ideals generalize Ernst Eduard Kummer's ideal numbers, devised as part of Kummer's 1843 attempt to prove Fermat's Last Theorem. (Thus Dedekind can be said to have been Kummer's most important disciple.) In an 1882 article, Dedekind and Heinrich Martin Weber applied ideals to Riemann surfaces, giving an algebraic proof of the Riemann–Roch theorem.

1880

Dedekind was elected to the Academies of Berlin (1880) and Rome, and to the French Academy of Sciences (1900). He received honorary doctorates from the universities of Oslo, Zurich, and Braunschweig.

1888

In 1888, he published a short monograph titled Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? ("What are numbers and what are they good for?" Ewald 1996: 790), which included his definition of an infinite set. He also proposed an axiomatic foundation for the natural numbers, whose primitive notions were the number one and the successor function. The next year, Giuseppe Peano, citing Dedekind, formulated an equivalent but simpler set of axioms, now the standard ones.

1900

Dedekind made other contributions to algebra. For instance, around 1900, he wrote the first papers on modular lattices. In 1872, while on holiday in Interlaken, Dedekind met Georg Cantor. Thus began an enduring relationship of mutual respect, and Dedekind became one of the very first mathematicians to admire Cantor's work concerning infinite sets, proving a valued ally in Cantor's disputes with Leopold Kronecker, who was philosophically opposed to Cantor's transfinite numbers.