| Who is it? | Second Maurya Emperor |
| Birth Place | Indian |
| Died On | c. 273 BCE |
| Reign | c. 297 – c. 273 BCE |
| Coronation | c. 297 BCE |
| Predecessor | Chandragupta Maurya |
| Successor | Ashoka |
| Spouse | Susima's mother Ashoka's mother (Subhadrangi according to Ashokavadana) |
| Issue | Susima Ashoka Vitashoka |
| Dynasty | Maurya |
| Father | Chandragupta Maurya |
| Mother | Durdhara (according to Jain tradition) |
Bindusara, famously known as the Second Maurya Emperor in Indian history, is estimated to have a substantial net worth ranging from $100,000 to $1 million in the year 2024. As a prominent ruler during the Maurya Empire, Bindusara's wealth can be attributed to various factors, including his vast dominion, strong trade ties, and control over valuable resources. His reign witnessed significant economic growth and prosperity, leading to a considerable accumulation of wealth. Bindusara's net worth serves as a testament to his successful reign and the economic affluence experienced by the Maurya Empire during his era.
Bindusara was born to Chandragupta, the founder of the Mauryan Empire. This is attested by several sources, including the various Puranas and the Mahavamsa. The Dipavamsa, on the other hand, names Bindusara as the son of the king Shushunaga. The prose version of Ashokavadana states that Bindusara was the son of Nanda, and a 10th-generation descendant of Bimbisara. Like Dipavamsa, it omits Chandragupta's name altogether. The metrical version of Ashokavadana contains a similar genealogy with some variations.
Chandragupta had a marriage alliance with the Seleucids, which has led to speculation that Bindusara's mother might have been Greek or Macedonian. However, there is no evidence of this. According to the 12th century Jain Writer Hemachandra's Parishishta-Parvan, the name of Bindusara's mother was Durdhara.
The 16th century Tibetan Buddhist author Taranatha states that Chanakya, one of Bindusara's "great lords", destroyed the nobles and kings of 16 towns and made him master of all the territory between the western and the eastern sea (Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal). According to some historians, this implies conquest of Deccan by Bindusara, while others believe that this only refers to suppression of revolts.
